Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Quiz : Does India has any national language as per Constitution of India? No


From the birth, many of us been under the impression that Hindi is the national language of India. Do you know that India does not have a national language?

Many of my friends are also under the impression that Hindi is the Raashtra Bhasha of India. Also, I can safely conclude that more than half of India’s population is under the same impression. Oh, come on, India!

But now it surprises me to hear that India never had a national language. This explains why India attached importance to each of its constituent languages. I do not know who first put this thought in my mind. There is one very interesting fact about the languages of India. Though India may boast of being home to many major languages of the world, this abode of languages, ironically, does not have a national language of its own. According to the Constitution of India, any language, accepted by a State of India as its official language will be given the status of national language. In India, no language is accepted or spoken by the States unanimously. Even Hindi, the language spoken by most people, is unable to attain the status of national language as it is does not fulfil the condition laid down by the Constitution of India. Though Hindi is spoken by a large number of people, only ten States of India have accepted it as their official language.

Article 343 of the Constitution declares Hindi as the official language of the Un-ion of India. English remains the additional official language. It is the authoritative legislative and judicial language. In fact, one could say that English is the official language of India for all practical purposes. For many educated Indians, English is virtually their first language though a large number of Indians are multi-lingual.

Then what is the difference between national and official language? The national language defines the people of the nation, culture and history. The official language is used for official communication. While the national language can become the official language by default, an official language has to be approved by law in order to become the national language. All languages spoken in India, starting from the language spoken by the most people to that spoken by the least are our national languages. This is because all of them define the people of this nation, culture and their history, collectively. India has no legally-defined national language; it has only 18 official languages according to the Constitution. There is a special provision for the development of Hindi under Article 351, though.

According to article 351, “It shall be the duty of the Union to promote the spread of the Hindi language, to develop it so that it may serve as a medium of expression for all the elements of the composite culture of India and to secure its enrichment by assimilating without interfering with its genius, the forms, style and expressions used in Hindustani and in the other languages of India specified in the Eighth Schedule, and by drawing, wherever necessary or desirable, for its vocabulary, primarily on Sanskrit (dead language – guys are trying to give life to that – no offence meant though) and secondarily on other languages”.

The Constitution of India came into existence on January 26, 1950. It said that Hindi and English would be the "official languages" of the Central government of India till 1965 (for a period of 15 years); subsequently, Hindi was expected to become the sole "national and official language" of India. This applied to Central as well as State governments. Hindi and English became the "official languages" in every department controlled by the Central government. This explains why Hindi is prominent in the Indian Railways, the nationalised banks, etc, which come under the purview of the Central government.

Between 1948 and 1961, on an average, every year, close to 24% of Central government officials had been selected from the State of Madras (the present-day Tamil Nadu). Uttar Pradesh came second best, accounting for about 16%.

The 1940s, 1950s and the first half of the 1960s witnessed many anti-Hindi pro-tests in the form of public meetings, marches, hunger strikes and demonstrations before schools and Central government offices; black flag demonstrations greeted Central government ministers. Most of these were organized either by the DK or the DMK and the general public supported them fully. There were hundreds of such protests from Tamil Nadu and thousands were jailed. Several hundreds were injured when police used lathi-charge to disperse the peaceful protesters. Lal Bahadur Shastri, the then PM, even though supportive of the pro-Hindi group, came up with a set of compromises that denied Hindi the "sole national language" status, realising the seriousness of the issue.

As January 26, 1965 neared, some in the non-Hindi belt, particularly the Tamils, started voicing their apprehensions openly. The idea of making Hindi the sole national language was blasphemous to the students as it involved the simultaneous and complete withdrawal of English, even as a medium for competitive examinations for jobs and education! This meant that the northern region would bag government jobs and dominate the field of education, given the proficiency in Hindi of the people of the region. Since government jobs were the most sought after in the pre-1991 era, the measure was seen as an indirect attempt to deny jobs to the English-educated South Indians. The non-Hindi-speaking people from South India feared that they would be discriminated against in government employment and in other possible ways.

See this pic, this is reality…. real life of India (not the reeling life of India)….

Always, I am proud about my language, Tamil and my state which shown tremendous growth and stature – also i do salute anyone and any of their language. If someone enforces any secondary language, i am ready to learn – it’s part of growth, knowledge – that doesn’t mean, i need to leave my own mother and start sweeping my step mother’s legs for getting little profit. I understand Mom is always mom, she can’t equal to my own mom – once the step mom, have her own child, she will start treat anyone in a stewardly attitude, false and fabricated love.

 

I believe by birth, my mother tongue is Tamil and I am proud to be a Tamilian. By nationality i am Indian – but i can’t accept any other consequences – either by law, enforcement – i believe in elasticity limit – so, it will outburst, remember what had happened with my ancestors!!

I never accept the fact just by born as North Indian who know Hindi equals to literally improved southern states, who know what is literacy, family, life – not yield malnutrinioned children's like animals in dozens and increase Indian population etc…. It’s way difference between from the developed homosaphens to don't want to develop monkeys…

India has 22 different language. Some of them spoken by large majority of people and some of the by less number of people. It is Indian government's duty to promote every language spoken not to a particular language. It very very bad idea to announce Hindi as National language. Official status is ok. During those indepenance time, Indian politics is dominated by north Indians. They knew only Hindi is India and India is Hindi. That is why the were trying to pass that bill in the parliament to give Hindi a national language status. But there was a strong opposition from south. Eventually the bill failed in the parliament. But still some north India states believe Hindi as a national language.

Can you answer my question is,

+ Since Hinduism is followed by majority indians, so can we have Hindu as a national religion?
+ Since roti is eaten by majority Indians, can we have roti as a national food? while other delecious food like dosa, vada are arond in the south.

Still you want to hear more…

3 comments:

  1. Deva

    Really Superb.....

    Also more info on Wiki

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hindi_agitations_of_Tamil_Nadu

    I would like to add C.N. Annadurai ( Arignar Anna's Words in Parliament )

    Annadurai's response to the "numerical superiority of Hindi" argument: "If we had to accept the principle of numerical superiority while selecting our national bird, the choice would have fallen not on the peacock but on the common crow....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sanskrit is not a "dead" language. Rather, it provides the seminal grammar and in many cases, vocabulary, for the vast majority of modern languages on the sub-continent. It is also the language of ancient India as well as the Hindu and Buddhist traditions. Therefore, it is logical that Sanskrit be source upon which modern language and words are derived.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I dont want to comment or presume your logical thinking and mindset. Also Sanskrit can't be a source for Tamil. Because Sanskrit is not part of Dravidian languages, it's Aryan and middle east language. If we talk about ethnic indian (not about migrants from middle east/afghan) then its only stands with Dravidian Culture. Its better to know about history, ancestory and indian culture before we talk. BTW, i am not against any language, but it should not forced against others. If you do, it remembers,"...step mom can't replace actual mom..."... i believe you better understand now...

    ReplyDelete